Response to “The Shape of Time”
The idea in which I connected the most with was his idea of the manuscript draft by the replicated mass. The individuals completing the puzzle are having different experiences, are in different circumstances and cannot ever possibly make the puzzle exactly the same as the original.
I also could relate to his interpretation that prime objects are very much like prime numbers in that they cannot be broken down, the viewer does not see the parts of the whole, they do not know the how’s or the whys of the prime object.
The evolution of a prime object over time was also another relatable concept, nothing in history ever stays the same even if the maker is trying to exactly replicate something else.